Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done
by Larry Bossidy and Ram Charan
Chief executives have five primary responsibilities. They set
goals, define the scope,
ensure capabilities, establish the
processes and initiate the execution. Goals support
the mission of the company and provide direction. The scope delineates
the organization’s parameters of operations. Capabilities are
the skills and proficiencies the company has or needs to acquire
to accomplish the objectives. The processes are those
internal mechanism and procedures required to function in an
efficient manner. And lastly, execution is the course
of action that ensures the successful accomplishment of the
first four.
---------------------------------------------
In the book titled, Execution:
The Discipline of Getting Things Done, the
authors state that senior leadership spends too much time
and places too much emphasis
on “high-level” strategizing,
intellectualizing and philosophizing on goals, scope, and
capabilities and not enough on implementation. Execution
is the most important
function of a chief executive, yet it is the one they pay
the least attention to - delegating it to lower level staff,
trusting
they will get the job done. The action of execution cannot
be seen as separate from “high-level strategy” it
has to be part of it. It must be seen as the top priority
of the chief executive, an integral part of his/her strategy,
a discipline that must become a core element of their persona
and organization’s culture.
The intellectual challenge of execution is in getting to the
heart of an issue through persistent and constructive probing.
How people talk to each other determines how well the organizations
will function. If its dialogue is stilted, politicized, fragmented,
and self-serving reality will never come to the surface. If it’s
candid, raising the right questions, debating them, and finding
realistic solutions it is reality-based. Execution activities
cannot succeed without dynamic dialogue -- one that brings reality
to the surface through openness, candor, and informality.
Openness encourages robust dialogue, candor helps wipe out the
silent lies and pocket vetoes, as well as prevents the “stalled
initiatives,” and informality provides a relaxed atmosphere
and reduces the defiant attitude. Chief executives set the tone
of the dialogue in the organization. If they want reality-based
discussions they must set the example, along with their management
team and forcefully ensuring its implementation throughout the
organization.
Leaders cannot just sign off on the “plans” and
accomplish this reality-based dialogue. The chief executive must
insist on explanations, and be willing to “drill down” until
the answers and explanations are clear. The senior executive
must ensure that everyone involved in the plan’s design
and those that are responsible for implementing it are engaged
in the dialogue, bringing their viewpoints out into the open
and assessing the degree and nature of buy-in. The chief executive’s
responsibility doesn’t end here - he/she must continue
to ensure “rigorous” discussions on the how’s
and what’s of the execution. The leader must frequently
raise questions throughout the course of the execution, persistently
keeping informed, and clearly communicating who is responsible.
This effort results in getting agreement and closure from all
the participants, establishing follow-through measures to make
sure people are meeting their commitments or to work out corrective
steps if they aren’t.
Follow-through is the cornerstone of execution, and every leader
who’s good at executing follows through religiously. Following
through ensures that people are doing the things they committed
to do, according to the agreed timetable. It assists in breaking
down long-term goals into short-term targets. Meeting those here-and-now
targets forces decisions to be made and integrated across the
organization, both initially and in response to changes in business
conditions. Follow-through exposes any disconnects between ideas
and actions, and if circumstances change and the plan can’t
be executed follow-through ensures swift and creative action
with the new conditions.
Another critical aspect of execution is leadership. One of the
realities of being a senior executive is to pick other leaders.
Chief executives cannot delegate this responsibility regardless
of the size of the organization. Every organization has jobs
filled with the wrong people often times because the leader is
comfortable with them. If the non-performer is high enough in
the organization he/she can destroy it. Chief executives must
insist and ensure that the right people are in the right positions
and that the wrong people are dealt with in an equitable way.
The chief executive must also look at whether there are high-potential
people in the wrong jobs and whether key people will be lost
if a job is not unblocked for them.
Even the best people process doesn’t always get the right
people in the right jobs, and it can’t make everybody into
a good performer. Some managers have been promoted beyond their
capabilities and need to be put in lesser jobs. Others just have
to be moved out. The final test of a people process is how well
it distinguishes between these two types, and how well leaders
handle the painful actions they have to take. “Preserving
the dignity of people who leave jobs is an important part of
reinforcing the positive nature of the performance culture.”
Bossidy and Charan point out that just because it is the primary
responsibility of the leader to ensure the execution it does
not mean micromanaging the process. Such action impacts negatively
on the employees. It diminishes their self-confidence, saps their
initiatives, and stifles their ability to think for themselves.
It’s also a formula for disappointing results - micromanagers
rarely know as much about what needs to be done as the people
they’re disturbing - the ones who actually do the work.
The authors go on to state, “it’s not about micromanaging,
it is about macromanaging.” The book talks about the value
of quarterly reviews which help keeps the leader informed, the
plan up to date and reinforce synchronization. They also give
the leader a good idea about which people are on top of their
business, which ones aren’t, and what the latter need to
do.
The book goes into seven essential behaviors a leader must have
to ensure successful execution. They are:
- Know your people
and your business. Make a personal connection, have an open
mind and positive demeanor, be informal and have
a sense of humor. Be aware of the natural resistance your employees
have to new ideas (one more time-consuming project that will
become another idea of the month) and overcome it by your personal
involvement to make sure everyone takes it seriously.
- Insist
on the facts even if they are very uncomfortable and contrary
to your desires. Realism is the heart of execution -
embrace it. Know your organizations strengths as well as
its weaknesses, what your competitors are doing and measure
your
progress by what’s happening in the external environment
not your internal environment.
- Set only three or four clear
and concise goals. (Focusing on just a few will get the
best results.) Prioritize them so
that everyone knows the direction.
- Follow through. Make sure
people are identified to follow through and that everyone
knows who is accountable for the results.
- Reward
the doers. Distinguish between those who achieve results
and those who don’t and show that differential in salary,
bonus, promotion, etc.
- Expand people’s capabilities through
coaching. The most effective way to coach is to observe
a person in action and then
provide specific useful feedback. Ask penetrating questions,
force people to think, to discover, to search. Every successful
leader must recognize their role as teacher.
- Know yourself. Develop emotional fortitude and be honest with yourself.
Good leaders learn their specific personal strengths
and weaknesses, especially in dealing with other people,
then build on the strengths and correct the weaknesses. Without
emotional fortitude, chief executives have a hard time hiring
the best
people. Emotional weak leaders will surround themselves
with
people who can be counted on to be “loyal” and
exclude those that challenge him/her with new thinking.
The book Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done explains
that execution is a specific, yet simple set of behaviors and
techniques that chief executives need to understand and implement
in order to ensure the successful obtainment of their goals.
When senior management fails to understand their responsibility
or ignores their role in execution, the results are a lack
of clear understanding as to who has responsibility and for what
and what happens next. Failure to execute successfully drains
the energy from the organization and repeated failure destroys
it. This monograph only shares a small portion of the book’s
plainspoken truths on how simple actions by chief executives
can ensure successful execution. As Bossidy and Charan stated,
execution is the difference between establishing goals and accomplishing
them. Execution offers the reader a great road map on how to
ensure a successful execution process within an organization.
Its’ message is clear, never launch an initiative unless
you’re personally committed to it and prepared to see it
through until it is embedded in the DNA of an organization.
_______________________________
Presented by Three Dimensional, LLC.
For more information contact
Walt Tomenga or Terry Myers at info@3-dllc.com or
515-240-1510
|